Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

3Â÷¿ø ½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ È¥ÇÕÄ¡¿­±â ¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿ÀÇ ±¸°³ÇüÅ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PALATAL MORPHOLOGY OF THE CHILDREN WITH CROSSBITE IN MIXED DENTITION BY 3-DIMENSIONAL LASER SCANNER

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 30±Ç 1È£ p.132 ~ 142
±Ç¿µ¸í, Á¤ÀÎÇÐ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±Ç¿µ¸í (  ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤ÀÎÇР(  ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Hellman Ä¡·É ¥²A±â¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ´Â ÀüÄ¡ºÎ ¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿ÀÇ ±¸°³ÇüÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æ¯Â¡À» 3Â÷¿ø ·¹ÀÌÀú ½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¶»çÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿°ú Á¤»ó±³ÇվƵ¿ °¢°¢ 20°³ÀÇ »ó¾Ç ¼®°í¸ðÇüÀ» äµæÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ¸ðÇüÀº 3Â÷¿ø ·¹ÀÌÀú ½ºÄ³³Ê(Intertec, Korea)·Î ½ºÄµÇÑ ÈÄ rapidform 2000 ÇÁ·Î±×·¥(INUS, Korea)À¸·Î 3Â÷¿ø À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ¾ò¾úÀ¸¸ç, Rhino 3D ÇÁ·Î±×·©(rhinoceros, USA)À¸·Î ¼öÄ¡È­ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÃøÁ¤ºÎÀ§´Â ¾çÃø À¯°ßÄ¡ ¹× Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¸¦ ¿¬°áÇÑ È¾´Ü¸é»óÀÇ ±¸°³ÇüÅ °î¼± ±×¸®°í ÀýÄ¡À¯µÎÀÇ ÃÖÁ¤Á¡¿¡¼­ ¾çÃø Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ ¿ø½É¸é±îÁöÀÇ ±¸°³ºÀÇÕ¼±À» µû¸£´Â ±¸°³ÇüÅ°µéÀ̾ú´Ù. °³Ã¼µé°£ÀÇ Å©±â Â÷ÀÌ º¸Á¤À» À§ÇØ ÃøÁ¤ºÎÀ§¸¦ °¢°¢ 25mm, 35mm, 35mm·Î Á¶Á¤ÇÏ¿© Ç¥ÁØÈ­ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ ±¸°³ÇüÅ°µé¿¡¼­ Á÷¼±°Å¸® °¢ 1mm¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ´Â Á¡µé¿¡¼­ÀÇ °î¼± ±íÀ̸¦ ¼Ò¼öÁ¡ 3ÀÚ¸®±îÁö ¼öÄ¡È­ ÇÏ¿© Æò±Õ ±¸°³ÇüÅ°À» ¾ò°í, ±× ÁÂÇ¥ Â÷À̸¦ 95% ½Å·Ú±¸°£ÀÇ t-test¸¦ ÅëÇØ ºñ±³, ºÐÀûÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1.¾çÃø À¯°ßÄ¡¸¦ ¿¬°áÇÑ È¾´Ü¸é»óÀÇ Æò±Õ±¸°³ÇüÅ°Àº ¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿ÀÌ Á»´õ ÆòźÇÑ VÀÚÇüÀÇ °î¼±ÇüŸ¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª. ¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿°ú Á¤»ó±³ÇվƵ¿ »çÀÌ¿¡ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(P>0.05).
2. ¾çÃø Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¸¦ ¿¬°áÇÑ È¾´Ü¸é»óÀÇ Æò±Õ±¸°³ÇüÅ°Àº ¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿ÀÌ Á¤»ó±³ÇվƵ¿º¸´Ù ´õ ±¸°³ÀÇ ±íÀÌ°¡ ±í¾úÀ¸¸ç, »ó¾Ç ¿ìÃø Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ Ä¡Àº ÃÖÇϹæÁ¡¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ 8mm¿Í 21mmÀ§Ä¡ »çÀÌÀÇ ±¸°£¿¡¼­ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡
ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(P<0.05).
3.¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿°ú Á¤»ó±³ÇվƵ¿°£ÀÇ ±¸°³ºÀÇÕ¼±ÀÇ Æò±Õ±¸°³ÇüÅ°¿¡¼­´Â Àü±¸°£¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ¹Ý´ë±³ÇվƵ¿ÀÌ ´õ ±íÀº °î¼±ÇüŸ¦ º¸¿´°í, Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Îµµ À¯ÀÇÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(P<0.01).
This study is performed to investigate the characteristics of the palatal morphology of the children with anterior crossbite in Hellman dental age IIlA by 3-dimensional laser scanner.
Totally 40 study casts were taken; 20 were from children with crossbite and another 20 were from normal occlusion as a control. Each cast was scanned by 3 dimension laser scanner and shaped by the 3 dimension image by rapidform 2000 program(INUS, Korea). And finally it was calculated by Rhino 3D program(Rhinoceros, USA)
The intercanine, intermolar cross-sectioned transverse plane and sagittal plane were measured. Due to the variations in palatal morphology, each group was standardized into 25mm. 35mm, 35mm. By sectioning standardized curves of the palatal morphology per 1mm, the palatal depth of each point was calculated. Through these complex methods, the mean curves of the palatal morphology could be obtained and the values were statistically compared and evaluated by T-test with 95% of significance level.
The results were as follows:
1. In the intercanine cross-sectioned transverse plane, the mean curve of palatal morphology of crossbite group was flatter V shape than that of control group, however. there was no statistical significance was found between two groups(P)0.05).
2. In the intermolar cross-sectioned transverse plane, the mean curve of palatal morphology of crossbite was deeper all over the area than that of control group, and the statistical significance was found in the middle area from point 8 to 21(P(0.05).
3. In the sagittal plane, the mean curve of palatal morphology of crossbite group was more deepening as approaching posteriorly than that of control group, and the statistical significance was found in all over the area(P(0.01).

Å°¿öµå

¹Ý´ë±³ÇÕ;3Â÷¿ø ·¹ÀÌÀú ½ºÄ³³Ê;±¸°³ÇüÅÂ;Crossbite;3-dimensional laser scanner;Palatal morphology

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI